Showing posts with label World War Two. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World War Two. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Internet Bloggers, Reporters, Rumor Mongers and the Zombies

An Internet Addict. Photo Credit: Mind Disorders.

Internet Bloggers, Reporters, Rumor Mongers and the Zombies

Who is not caught and entangled in the world wide web of the internet?
Almost everyone is caught in it, whether you are using the internet or not, your existence today is affected by it, because in this Information Age, even those who are still stuck in the Stone Age cannot escape from the tentacles of the matrix controlling the stream of consciousness of humans in every nook and cranny of the earth. No matter how you pretend and try to avoid the internet, you will one day be faced with its inevitability when you have to use the computer that comes in the form of the mobile phone that has become the most irresistible gadget in the world today, because it is now imperative for everyone to use it in daily communication. It is an oddity or rarity to see anyone who does not use a mobile phone today and once you use the mobile phone, you are soon caught in the World Wide Web and soon join in the communication hub of the earth.

Aborigines using a laptop in Australia. Photo Credit: Educational Cyberground.

The internet is now dictating the way humans communicate from the closet to the street and from the street to the government. The internet has swayed the momentum of human consciousness in billions of conversations going on the internet; helping to sway passions in political thoughts that ignited the Orange Revolution in Eastern Europe and the Arab Spring in the Middle East with the flood of tears and blood of the victims, the casualties of the consequences in different circumstances caused by the legions of sung and unsung heroes and villains And the social media is the most important catalyst of the internet. The social media is the greatest thing that has happened in the evolution of human communication since the caveman discovered how to make cave drawings. All you need to join us is just an access to the internet and it is a roller coaster ride all the way! The social media gives you the space to exercise the freedom of speech as never done before and the only powers that can control and stop you are the gatekeepers and they are the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and their partners, the publishers and owners of the millions of websites in the World Wide Web from Google to Facebook and the rest of us. . They cannot control your thoughts and conversations, but they can either approve them or disapprove them. They are the ones who have unleashed their legions of bloggers, reporters and rumor mongers on the rest of humankind, exchanging and sharing billions of accounts of stories of whatever is happening on earth, both fact and fiction and leave the choices to their audiences who are regular followers and invisible visitors from different locations and backgrounds in the world. The rest of humans who have not joined the viral conversations are more or less becoming zombies in the world.

It is necessary to separate the sheep from the goats, those who report and tell the truth from those who report and tell lies on the internet, because they are heroes and villains of the zombies who are swayed by the information of their masters. Of course, before the emergence of the internet, the world has always been inhabited by the good, the bad and the ugly and their zombies. So, the internet as a product of humans will always be inhabited by the same characters found everywhere among us. The internet has only given us all more freedom to say whatever we want to say and often escape from behind our small or big computers. But we must separate the wheat from the chaff in all things. Therefore, let us know the rumor mongers among bloggers and reporters on the millions of websites on the internet.

Do not accept everything you see on the internet until you are sure of it is a fact. The same internet also helps us to find out the fact as falsehoods are debunked and refuted even before the sunset unlike before when there was no internet and news reporters published both confirmed and unconfirmed news of events and incidents which the ignorant and unsuspecting readers cannot verify until the following day or even longer when the falsehoods would have done damages to reputations, and even caused the loss of lives and properties before the people knew that it was a foolish and unnecessary conflict.

Rumors spread by the mainstream media have even provoked riots and caused wars. But the internet has made it possible for everyone to report or tell what fact is or fiction instantly without censorship of the editors or owners of the press. And in fact, the internet would have averted the catastrophic world wars and other wars if it existed before then as the information for or against the arguments of these human conflicts would have gone viral and diffused before they could explode before our very eyes and millions of the lives lost would have been saved. Would Adolf Hitler have succeeded today?
No! Because, he would not have been able to fool millions of Germans to accept his Final Solution for the extermination of the Jews in Europe and the holocaust would have been averted. The internet has made us all wiser!

The internet has given us all the possibilities of what dialogue can do for humanity and honestly the positives are a million times more than the negatives, because everyone can easily sort out the odds and ends on the internet and life goes on, even the zombies will no longer be fooled and misled by their masters.


~ By Ekenyerengozi Michael Chima, August 1, 2012, Lagos, Nigeria.
Michael Chima is the most popular African blogger with over 30 blogs and the author of Children of Heaven, Sleepless Night, Scarlet Tears of London, Bye, Bye Mugabe, In the House of Dogs and co-author of Naked Beauty. His new books The Prophet Lied, and Barack Obama and the American Dream will be released before Christmas. He is also a TV/Film producer and Founder of the annual Eko International Film Festival in Lagos, Nigeria.




















Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Ronald Reagan is the Best American President Since World War 2


The charismatic Ronald Wilson Reagan( February 6, 1911 – June 5, 2004), the 40th President of the United States has been rated as the best American President since World War Two and the second best in history after Abraham Lincoln and followed by George Washington according to the Harris Poll released today ahead of this year's Presidents' Day on February 21, 2012.

Guess who is rated the worst President?
George W. Bush!

The following is the complete report of the poll.

NEW YORK, Feb. 15, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- As the nation prepares to celebrate Presidents' Day, it is always interesting to see what people think about some of the past presidents. Looking at all the presidents since World War II, one-quarter of Americans (25%) say Ronald Reagan is the best president, one in five (19%) say Franklin Roosevelt while 15% say it is John Kennedy and 12% say Bill Clinton. The nine other presidents, including Barack Obama, are at 4% or less.

Looking at the flip side, just over one-quarter of U.S. adults (27%) say that George W. Bush was the worst president while just under one-quarter (22%) say Barack Obama is the worst; one in ten (12%) say the worst was Richard Nixon. The ten other presidents are at 5% or less.

These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,016 adults surveyed online between January 16 and 23, 2012 by Harris Interactive.

Partisan differences
Presidents are elected bearing a party label, so it's not surprising that partisans have different opinions about who the best and worst presidents are. For Republicans, over half (55%) say Ronald Reagan was the best president and almost half (47%) say Barack Obama is the worst president. Among Democrats, there are three presidents bunched near the top for best – Franklin Roosevelt (25%), Bill Clinton (22%) and John Kennedy (18%). It's an easier choice for worst president for Democrats as almost half (48%) say George W. Bush was the worst.

For Independents, there isn't a clear answer for either category. One-quarter of Independents (24%) say Franklin Roosevelt was the best, one in five (21%) say Ronald Reagan was the best and 17% say the best was John Kennedy. Looking at the other side, one-quarter (24%) say George W. Bush was the worst president while one in five Independents (19%) say Barack Obama is the worst.

Best presidents in history
If the list of presidents is expanded to include some of the founding fathers, such as Washington, Jefferson and Adams, as well as other presidents including Lincoln, Wilson and Jackson, the results of who is best change slightly. If we look at a combined best or second best, one-third of Americans (32%) say Abraham Lincoln was the best president, one-quarter (26%) say Ronald Reagan was the best and one in five say George Washington (21%), John Kennedy (21%) and Bill Clinton (19%) were the best presidents.

So What?
History has shown us that a president is best judged years after he has left office. Decisions made while sitting in the Oval Office may be seen as the wrong decision by many Americans at that point in time, but as time passes, the wisdom of some of these hard choices becomes clear. And, the reverse is also true.

Click here for the rest of the report.

Top News Topics

Muslim Leader Speaks of Islamophobia at Opening of New Mosque

Entertainment Awards

Death of Whitney Houston

Federal Budget

Bahrain's Ambassador to the U.S. Houda Nonoo Launches Official Blog

James Shelton Announces Candidacy for House District 49

US Sen. Bob Casey Press Event on Philly Refineries Feb. 15; USW Oil Workers Mobilize for D.C. 'Lobby & Action Day'

Arbitron Inc. Reports 2011 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial Results and Issues 2012 Financial Guidance

Rentrak to Present at Deutsche Bank 2012 Media and Telecommunications Conference

Anchors Aweigh! Pirate Storm is Going Live

Princess Kisses the Frog; FrogAds.com Global Alexa Rankings Surpass the 50,000 Mark


Releases displayed in Africa/Lagos time
15 Feb 2012
15:08 CLS Investments and Meeder Financial Available to Serve as Managed Account Providers on Retirement Products
15:00 American Foundation for Equal Rights and Broadway Impact Announce: Complete All-Star Cast for West Coast Premiere of Dustin Lance Black's Prop. 8 Play
15:00 GPS Shoe to be Featured in 100 Most Important Inventions of Mankind Exhibit
15:00 City Capital Corporation Green Energy Expansion
15:00 One Small Step for Schools, One Giant Leap for Education
15:00 Showcase at National Conference on Bullying to Feature SchoolMessenger's Talk About It Anonymous Bullying-Prevention Service
15:00 CHANGING THE STORY: Bold Solutions to Helping Youth Find Jobs, ?Open Pathways to Education and Develop Lifelong Self-Sufficiency
14:25 Cureology, Hair Care That Shares, Natural Organic Hair Care That Supports Breast Cancer Research and Education
14:15 John Frieda® Global Creative Consultant Luigi Murenu Creates the Look for Zac Posen Fall 2012
14:15 Science of Mouth Pain May Surprise You, Says Dental Implant Expert
14:05 Tiny Prints Affiliate Program, Managed by Acceleration Partners, Wins the 2012 'Exceptional Merchant Award'
14:05 Total Artificial Heart Patient Receives Donor Heart 15 Years After Decision to Donate Wife's Organs
14:00 Women's Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC) Announces New List of 2011 America's Top Corporations for Women's Business Enterprises
14:00 Farmer Thaddeus Barsotti Teams with Sacramento Children's Museum to Promote Healthy Eating
13:55 Pratt & Whitney Teaches Singapore Polytechnic Students to Power the Future
13:55 Anlit Enters Polish Market with New Food Supplements for Kids
13:19 Confused.com Reveals Young Male Drivers Pay Almost Double for Insurance Compared to Women
12:00 Former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Michael Mullen and SAC Capital Advisors Founder Steven Cohen to Co-Chair the Robin Hood Foundation's Veterans Advisory Board
12:00 OneStopPlus.com® Introduces Second Issue of Curvy Women's Lifestyle Publication OSP MAG®
11:00 El Doctor Bustamante, reconocido científico en el área de la biofísica, ganó el máximo galardón para los inmigrantes en la ciencia




Friday, May 20, 2011

Cannes, please revoke the ban on Lars von Trier




Cannes boots von Trier for Hitler comments

Cannes festival reacts to Danish director's strange remarks about Nazis by declaring him 'persona non grata.'

Copyright (c) CBC 2011


Lars von Trier

Cannes, please revoke the ban on Lars von Trier

The controversial Danish film director and screenwriter Lars von Trier is well known for his provocative art films such as the horrifying Gothic and pornographic Antichrist that also shocked audiences at the 62nd Cannes Film Festival in 2009. Therefore, when it was reported that he has rattled the organizers of the festival at the Wednesday press parley before the premiere of his apocalyptic science fiction film Melancholia at the 64th Cannes Film Festival, I was not surprised, because it is his signature for grabbing headlines. The organizers should have ignored his “I’M A NAZI” joke and claiming to understand Adolf Hitler. He has done it again and got the whole paparazzi going gaga over his unsavoury act. And then apologized after getting the attention for his his new film. Lars von Trier's shocking allusion to Adolf Hitler is another deliberate kind of deus ex machina and it has attracted the attention of the global village.

"I am not anti-Semitic or racially prejudiced in any way, nor am I a Nazi," Lars von Trier said.
"I really wanted to be a Jew, and then I found out that I was really a Nazi, because, you know, my family was German," von Trier said. "Which also gave me some pleasure."

"What can I say? I understand Hitler, but I think he did some wrong things, yes, absolutely. But I can see him sitting in his bunker in the end," von Trier said. "He's not what you would call a good guy, but I understand much about him, and I sympathize with him a little bit. But come on, I'm not for the Second World War, and I'm not against Jews."

Declaring him "persona non grata" and banning him from future Cannes is UNFAIR and HYPOCRITICAL!

Hello Festival de Cannes! What happened to Freedom of Expression or Free Speech which is clearly defined and stated in Articles 18 and 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights Charter

Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Please, the Cannes Film Festival should revoke the ban on this extraordinary radical Danish filmmaker and screenwriter, because it is reactionary and retrogressive in the further development of film-making as an art and a democratic vehicle for intellectual freedom.

~ By Ekenyerengozi Michael Chima


Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Why We Decided a Ronald Reagan Movie is Vital Today


Ronald Reagan

Why We Decided a Ronald Reagan Movie is Vital Today
by (more by this author)
Posted 02/10/2009 ETUpdated 02/10/2009 ET


Ronald Reagan called it our “Rendezvous with Destiny.” It was his belief in America and the American people, and his vision for peace and prosperity.That was almost thirty years ago, when he began a Presidency that, in his words, set out to change the country, and ended up changing the world.

So why did we decide to make a movie about President Ronald Reagan and his beliefs today?How Courageous Leadership Can Rally America to Real ChangeToday, just as in 1980 when Ronald Reagan was elected President, America is faced with extraordinary threats abroad and an economic crisis at home.

We made our movie, “Ronald Reagan: Rendezvous with Destiny” (visit http://rendezvouswithdestinymovie.com/ads/newt-email.html) in the hope that a new generation of Americans will learn about the power of principled leadership, the force of deeply held convictions, and the capacity of one person to make a difference. We made this movie for millions of younger Americans who were born after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in the hope that they will understand the horrors of Communism, the dangers of unprincipled leadership, and the inspiring story of how President Reagan changed America and the world.

More Than a Movie, An Entertaining, Enlightening Part of American History“Ronald Reagan: Rendezvous with Destiny” is a production of Citizens United Productions in association with Gingrich Productions, and Peace River Company, LLC. We would like to thank the President of Citizens United, Dave Bossie, our Director, Kevin Knoblock, and the entire production team for their excellent work. This movie portrays President Reagan’s story from his humble beginnings in Illinois, through his career in Hollywood, his time as Governor of California and finally, President of the United States.Reagan’s Story, As Told By Those Closest to Him.

In “Rendezvous with Destiny,” President Reagan’s story is told by those who were closest to him as he changed America and the world. First hand, they tell us about President Reagan’s survival of an attempted assassination, just 70 days into his presidency, his triumph in passing the largest tax cut in American history, his sorrow over the loss of the American astronauts in the Challenger disaster, his tense confrontation with the Soviet Union, and other unforgettable chapters of his remarkable career.It is a quintessentially American story, and one that we believe desperately needs to be told today.Striking Parallels Between Today and Thirty Years AgoThere are striking parallels between today and almost thirty years ago when President Reagan was elected. Like 1980, America today is hungry for leadership.

We have an economic crisis at home and deadly enemies abroad. But the parallels end there. After campaigning on the politics of hope, President Barack Obama has resorted to governing on a different sort of politics. Last week, announcing a plan to cap the pay of executives at firms that accept government bailout money, something President Ronald Reagan would never have done, President Obama said something that President Reagan would never have said:

“The failure to act and to act now will turn crisis into catastrophe.”In terms alarmingly reminiscent of President Jimmy Carter’s infamous “crisis of confidence” speech in 1979, President Obama’s rhetoric is filled with references to America’s “uncertain future,” our “dreams deferred” and our “falling confidence.”As in 1980, the liberal leadership in Congress today is offering the country little more than big spending, high taxes and despair.

“We Are in the Midst of a Spring Time of Hope for America. Greatness Lies Ahead of Us”President Ronald Reagan offered something very different.His was not a vision based on fear, but a vision based on optimism and, above all, faith in the American people.America’s “Rendezvous with Destiny” was President Ronald Reagan’s unique vision of a future of peace and prosperity at a time when Americans were being told that we had a crisis of confidence at home and needed to learn to live with our enemies abroad.

Our movie is the story of one remarkable man’s belief that America would have its Rendezvous with Destiny, and that our Shining City on the Hill would survive and prosper. On this, President Ronald Reagan never wavered.

Reagan Set Out to Achieve Three Goals – And He SucceededPresident Reagan’s story is still relevant today. At this time of challenge and uncertainty, it’s useful to be reminded of what a great leader who believes in free people, free markets, and peace through strength can achieve.

President Reagan set out to achieve three remarkable goals and achieved them all:

1. To cure an ailing American economy.

2. To revive the American spirit.

3. To promote freedom at home and abroad.

More then merely a great communicator, he was man who moved America and history forward. He achieved as much as he did because he relied on the American people, not himself, to make a better nation.

“I Know That For America, There Will Always Be a Bright Dawn Ahead.”

Throughout his life, President Ronald Reagan pursued his goals and promoted his beliefs -- above all, his belief in the American people -- with faith, optimism, and courage.Even in announcing to the country, the personal tragedy of his Alzheimer’s Disease diagnosis, Ronald Reagan had the goodness and greatness of America foremost in his thoughts. In 1994 he wrote:

“I now begin the journey that will lead me into the sunset of my life. I know that for America, there will always be a bright dawn ahead.”

It has been a tremendous honor for us to be a part of telling the story of such a great man.

From the Gdansk Shipyards To Normandy Beach To The Reagan RanchIn making “Rendezvous with Destiny,” we traveled to the places where President Reagan traveled. We went to the Lenin Shipyards in Gdansk, Poland, where he inspired the freedom movement, known as Solidarity.We went to the cliff tops above the coast of Normandy, where he paid tribute to “the boys of Pointe Du Hoc,” the men who charged the beach in 1944 and helped end World War II. And we went to the Reagan Ranch in the hills above Santa Barbara, California, the modest, unassuming refuge to which Ronald and Nancy Reagan returned for rest and inspiration throughout his presidency and long after.

“Rendezvous with Destiny” takes the viewer, as well, to all these places and more.“We Carry the Message They’re Waiting For.”

We encourage all of you to visit http://www.gingrichproductions.com/ to see a preview of our movie. Tell your friends to do so as well, and consider “Rendezvous with Destiny” as a gift for a loved one or a friend.

For all those who share President Reagan’s beliefs, our movie’s message is best expressed, as usual, in Reagan’s own remarkable words. “Better than we’ve ever done before,” said Ronald Reagan, “we’ve got to quit talking to each other and about each other and go out and communicate to the world that we may be fewer in number than we’ve ever been, but we carry the message they’re waiting for.”



We hope you will enjoy Ronald Reagan: Rendezvous with Destiny.

Your Friends,

Newt and Callista Gingrich

P.S. Matt Towery has written a terrific book: Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of the 2008 Fight for the Presidency. I have known Matt since he first got involved in politics as a teenager in the 1970s. His polling firm, Insider Advantage, was ranked by one site as one of the three best polling firms in 2008. His insights will surprise you and give you new perspectives.

P.P.S. For an alternative to the big government, pork-laden stimulus bill, visit www.americansolutions.com/jobs.

Mr. Gingrich is the former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and author of "Winning the Future" (published by Regnery, a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).

Click here to get his free Winning the Future e-mail newsletter.


Hot Topics
Britain on the Brink: UK Economy Sliding Out of the Global Premier League
Nominations Announced for the 44th Annual Academy of Country Music(R) Awards Country Music's Party of the Year(TM)
Published Study Shows Brain Exercises Improve Memory and Attention - And People Notice
Netbook Popularity Continues to Grow With Online Consumers
Economic Stimulus Plan
Quarterly Earnings Reports
Westminster Dog Show
Valentine's Day
UK Government News Network Releases




Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Days of Infamy: Active History and the Teaching of History


Days of Infamy: Active History and the Teaching of History
by (more by this author)
Posted 04/29/2008 ETUpdated 04/29/2008 ET

This week our new novel, Days of Infamy, is being published by St. Martin's Press. Days of Infamy is the sequel to Pearl Harbor, (just released in paperback) and carries on the story of "what might have been" if a different, more aggressive commander -- Admiral Yamamoto -- had led the Japanese Fleet in their surprise attack at Pearl Harbor in December, 1941.

The Wrong Admiral for the Wrong Job
In real history, the Japanese high command assigned their Pearl Harbor strike force of six aircraft carriers to Admiral Chuichi Nagumo. If ever there was an assignment of the wrong man for the wrong job, it was this one.

From the beginning of his forty-year career, Nagumo had been trained in surface warfare, especially the use of destroyers and cruisers as "hit and run" weapons. Thinking like a destroyer commander, he always saw the attack on Pearl Harbor as a "hit and run" raid: Go in, strike, then get out as fast as possible. He believed, as did most admirals in virtually every navy in 1941, that the battleship was the key to victory -- and that the aircraft carrier was just a vulnerable and limited auxiliary to the battleship.

Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory
The real history of Pearl Harbor demonstrates the results of Nagumo's caution and traditionalism. After the two initial air raids, Americans forces on Oahu were wide open for total destruction. Our repair shops, dry docks, five million precious barrels of oil stockpiled in flimsy tanks, and especially our aircraft carriers (which luck, or fate, had placed outside the harbor that morning) were all vulnerable to renewed attack. The Japanese could have inflicted grievous additional blows. But a cautious "hit and run" admiral ordered an immediate retreat instead, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Thus our fascination with what we call "active history." Pearl Harbor asked readers to consider how profoundly different December 7, 1941, would have been if, instead of a cautious "hit and run" commander, the attack on Pearl Harbor had been led by Admiral Yamamoto, a man who understood the value of aircraft carriers and air power and whose goal was to wipe the slate clean on the first day of the war, sinking all of our carriers and gaining total air superiority across the Pacific.

Days of Infamy picks up where Pearl Harbor left off and invites readers to imagine how the ensuing battle in the Pacific might have been different with a small but significant twist in history.

Making History Come Alive
"Active history" is a concept my co-author, historian William Forstchen, and I developed a few years back (along with Albert Hanser, a contributing editor of all our books) to get people more interested in the leaders and events that have made us who we are. We were tired of history being taught in a boring way that forces students to memorize dates and events. That method makes people think of history as something to "get through" rather than something to enjoy, think about, argue over, and discuss.


As history professors (all three of us have doctorates in history and have taught with enthusiasm and excitement) we wanted to inject excitement and a dynamic sense of "what might have been" into the study and teaching of history. So we developed the concept of active history. Active history teaches readers the events that have shaped their lives by inviting them to compare what actually happened with what might have happened. It shows how the wisdom -- and the folly -- of decisions made in the past impact our lives today, and how our decisions, in turn, will effect our children and grandchildren.
Gettysburg, Grant Comes East, Never Call Retreat, and Pearl Harbor

In Gettysburg, Grant Comes East, and Never Call Retreat we developed an active history version of the Civil War beginning with Lee winning at Gettysburg (which General Bob Scales and Colonel Leonard Fullenkamp of the Army War College helped us develop and think through).
In Pearl Harbor we began applying the model of active history to World War II in the Pacific. Many years ago we wrote 1945 as an active history of WWII in Europe involving Germany, but we decided that for a longer series we wanted to focus on the Pacific. Even as Asia is becoming more and more important to the United States economically and militarily, much of the history of twentieth-century Asia has not been fully explored and written about.

Admiral Yamamoto: A Risk-Taking Air Power Advocate
In real history Admiral Yamamoto was both the intellectual force behind the Japanese naval strategy in 1941 and a leading advocate of naval airpower. He had commanded an aircraft carrier and was head of the Japanese navy's aeronautics department. He had presided over the development of several Japanese naval aircraft and had thought long and hard about the use of aircraft carriers.

From a novelist's perspective there is an additional aspect of Yamamoto's personality that is intriguing. He was a very successful gambler. He had won a lot of money at poker while serving in the United States and had been successful in the casinos of Monte Carlo while serving in Europe.

A Dramatically More Aggressive and Daring Japanese Attack


In Pearl Harbor, our decisive, active history plot twist was to shift from the timid, battleship-oriented Nagumo to the gambling, airpower advocate Yamamoto. We showed the initial evolution of a dramatically more aggressive and daring air attack.
Many students of the Pearl Harbor attack have wondered what would have happened if there had been a third wave of attack late in the day on December 7. In Pearl Harbor we give them our interpretation of that event.

In our active history there is a third wave launched at the now virtually defenseless naval and air facilities. Virtually all of the American aircraft had been destroyed on the ground in the first wave, and those who had gotten into the air were overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of Japanese aircraft.

If Yamamoto Had Commanded, Would He Have Left After Just One Day?
Now, in Days of Infamy, we ask a simple question: Would Admiral Yamamoto, knowing that he had complete air superiority, have left after just one day of attacks? We suggest that, unlike Nagumo, who wanted to leave as quickly as possible, Yamamoto would have planned for the possibility of staying two or three extra days. That means, for one thing, that he would have had to bring his tankers closer to Hawaii for the refueling needed for his destroyers.
And how would Yamamoto have evaluated the first day's success?

Where Nagumo focused on the sinking of the American battleships and felt very successful, we believe Yamamoto would have focused on the absence of the American aircraft carriers in the harbor that morning and would have felt very frustrated and almost in danger of failure.

Two Different Leaders, Two Different Histories
These two different views of what happened on December 7, 1941, demonstrate the importance of personality and doctrine in leaders.
Nagumo believed in a weapons system of the past. Yamamoto believed in the weapons system of the future. Therefore, they could look at the same evidence and reach exactly the opposite conclusions.

Nagumo was timid, tended to avoid risks, and valued safety for his ships over damaging the enemy's ships. Yamamoto was a gambler, a calculating risk taker, very aggressive, and focused on how many American ships he could sink -- not how many Japanese ships he could keep safe.
This intersection of personality and doctrine leads to a dramatic difference in how two different leaders would have fought at Pearl Harbor.

The Hunt for the Saratoga, the Lexington and the Enterprise
In Days of Infamy we carry the story to its next logical stage.
Admiral Yamamoto, having achieved decisive surprise on Sunday morning and having established complete air and sea superiority over the America forces, is now in a position to hunt for the missing American aircraft carriers.

The Japanese believe there are three American aircraft carriers in the Hawaiian Islands. Actually one of them, the Saratoga, has gone to Bremerton, Washington for refitting in such secrecy that the Japanese do not know it is gone (in real history, the Saratoga was actually pulling into San Diego on its way back from refitting on December 7).
The Lexington is near Midway where it is delivering aircraft (it would turn back, keeping the aircraft with it).

The Enterprise is on the way back from Wake Island, having delivered aircraft there.

Halsey versus Yamamoto in the Pacific
Admiral Halsey is in command of the Enterprise task force. He was America's most aggressive admiral. It is not surprising, then, that Halsey's reaction to the news of the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor is to hunt the Japanese.

Given Yamamoto's willingness to take risks and Admiral Halsey's confidence, it is easy to imagine the two of them aggressively seeking to destroy each other's forces in the battle that begins on December 8, the day after Pearl Harbor.
And that is where Days of Infamy begins....

Your friend,

Newt Gingrich

P.S. -- I've heard from many of you about my new ad with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. As I've said before, I believe that protecting the environment is an issue that conservatives must take seriously in order to promote innovative, entrepreneurial solutions to our environmental challenges rather than the regulation, litigation, and bureaucracy advocated by the left. If you have thoughts on this topic or would like to join in our ongoing discussion about Green Conservatism just click here.


P.P.S. -- A big week of endorsements and adoptions for the Platform of the American people!
The Nevada GOP held their state convention this weekend and adopted 13 planks/principles from the Platform of the American People into their party platform!

They also pledge to hold Nevada elected officials and those running to be Nevada elected officials accountable to the items in their platform. This is an example of what conventions and platform building should truly be about. Read more about the Nevada convention and see which planks they adopted!
U.S. Representative, Kay Granger (R-TX) endorsed the Platform of the American People this week!
Join the excitement! Sign up to be a part of the movement! And, as always, stay tuned to americansolutions.com for more updates.